"Perhaps side effects at "very low doses" of mercury
studied in a non-clinical setting, but only where real patients turn
up with their unsolved problems. Side effects are more or less
exceptional reactions, and will easily be overlooked if the patients
are not followed for long enough to see what happens when exposure
has been reduced or eliminated."
sluttet du kommentaren din.
Det ser ut til at vi kan bli enige om en veitrase.
Litt om egen erfaring:
Min bratte vestlandsgård er dramatisk og spennende, som en munn
med sølv og gull. (Bilder på snowboat.no) Men den og nabobrukene
manglet vei. Vi trengte ni km til sammen. Grunneierne (les:
pasientene) slo seg sammen. Jeg valgte å gå som spiss i
ledertroikaen. Det var lærerikt, også som et slags
Noen gikk i mot å få vei over sin eiendom (les: EMF/Hg kan
umulig stå bak mine helseproblemer).
Et tjuetall høringsinstanser skulle først uttale seg (les:
bivirkningsnemnd, legeforening, tannlegeforening,
universitetsklinikker osv.) Nesten samtlige stilte seg negative til
den nødvendige reguleringsplanen og veifremføringen.
Men de avgjørende myndigheter (les: statlige helsemyndigheter)
valgte å støtte vår argumentering og våre valg av
Vi bygget veinettet. For mitt vedkommende med stor egeninnsats.
Hva holder vi på med her og nå?
Hvem er våre samarbeidspartnere?
Hvem er våre motstandere?
Beklager at jeg ikke har lyst til å være mer konkret akkurat
--- I nordbiomed@y..., Per Dalen <pdalen@s...>
> This week's issue of the New England Journal of Medicine carries a
> article entitled "Current Concepts: The Toxicology of Mercury
> Exposures and Clinical Manifestations" by Thomas W. Clarkson,
> Magos, M.D., and Gary J. Myers, M.D. (Vol 349:1731-1737)
> The second paragraph of the article starts on a promising note, but
> "Today, however, exposure of the general population comes from
> sources: fish consumption, dental amalgams, and vaccines. Each has
> characteristic form of mercury and distinctive toxicologic profile
> clinical symptoms. Dental amalgams emit mercury vapor that is
> absorbed into the bloodstream. Dentists and anyone with an amalgam
> are exposed to this form of mercury. <snip> Humans are also
> distinct but related organic forms, methyl mercury (CH3Hg+) and
> mercury (CH3CH2Hg+). Fish are the main if not the only source of
> mercury, since it is no longer used as a fungicide. In many
> babies are exposed to ethyl mercury through vaccination, since this
> the active ingredient of the preservative thimerosal used in
> Whereas removal of certain forms of mercury, such as that in blood-
> cuffs, will not cause increased health risks, removal of each of
> major sources described in this article entails health risks and
> a dilemma to the health professional."
> And further:
> "Nevertheless, amalgam fillings are the chief source of
> vapor in the general population. Brain, blood, and urinary
> correlate with the number of amalgam surfaces present. It has been
> estimated that 10 amalgam surfaces would raise urinary
concentrations by 1
> µg of mercury per liter, roughly doubling the background
> Higher urinary concentrations are found in persons who chew a great
> For example, the long-term use of nicotine chewing gum will raise
> concentrations close to occupational health limits. The removal of
> fillings can also cause temporary elevations in blood
> the process transiently increases the amount of mercury vapor
> The authors seem to be firmly grounded in the tradition of
> health limits, and concentrations in blood and urine. From a
> of view this is somewhat sterile. Side effects of *drugs* usually
> ordinary (non-toxic) dosage levels in a minority of patients who
> abnormally sensitive. There is no reason whatever that mercury
> different in this respect. (The authors mention the concept of
> only once, when dealing with acrodynia: "It is believed to be a
> hypersensitivity reaction.")
> "Current concern arises from claims that long-term exposure to
> concentrations of mercury vapor from amalgams either causes or
> degenerative diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis,
> disease, multiple sclerosis, and Parkinson's disease. Speculation
> most intense with respect to Alzheimer's disease after a report
> brains of patients with Alzheimer's disease had elevated mercury
> concentrations. However, several epidemiologic investigations
> provide evidence of a role of amalgam in these degenerative
> including a long-term study of 1462 women in Sweden
> [<http://shorl.com/bobaprufosofu>], an ongoing Swedish twin study
> 587 subjects [<http://shorl.com/gygremujyposa>], and a study of 129
> to 102 years of age, which included eight tests of cognitive
> [<http://shorl.com/hiruvutolabe>]. Nevertheless, in vitro studies
> indicated that mercury can affect the biochemical processes
believed to be
> involved in Alzheimer's disease. The problem is that mercury can
> various biochemical processes in vitro without having the same
effect in vivo."
> The three epidemiologic studies mentioned here were all designed
> tacit but unwarranted assumption that any side effects of dental
> must be dose-dependent -- "the dose makes the poison". It
> by the way, that Paracelsus (1493-1541) seems to have coined this
> popular phrase when defending himself against reproaches for
> mercury in therapeutics in spite of this metal's notorious toxicity.
> The epidemiologic studies cited above each include less than 1000
> (A large proportion of the 1462 women in the first-mentioned study
> younger than 75 at their last follow-up). If those had been studies
> side effects of a drug, the detection threshold would have
> an incidence of at least several percent. Less common side effects
> that would have been missed completely!
> "Patients who have questions about the potential relation
> and degenerative diseases can be assured that the available
> no connection. Some will ask whether their mercury fillings should
> removed. They should be reminded that the process of removal
> mercury vapor and that blood concentrations will subsequently rise
> substantially before they eventually decline. There is no clear
> supporting the removal of amalgams."
> This is the conservative conclusion as far as amalgam is concerned.
> Then to thimerosal, and the general conclusion:
> "Given the short half-life of ethyl mercury, any risks of its
> either the brain or kidneys would seem remote. A World Health
> advisory committee recently concluded that it is safe to continue
> thimerosal in vaccines. This is especially important in developing
> countries, where the use of a preservative is essential in
> The known risk of infectious diseases far exceeds that of the
> risk of thimerosal. Claims have been made that thimerosal in
> be a cause of autism and related disorders, but studies testing
> have yet to be performed."
> "All forms of mercury have adverse effects on health at high
> However, the evidence that exposure to very low doses of mercury
> consumption, the receipt of dental amalgams, or thimerosal in
> adverse effects is open to wide interpretation. Moreover, attempts
> reduce such exposure may pose greater health risks than those
> to occur from mercury."
> <end of article>
> Perhaps side effects at "very low doses" of mercury cannot
studied in a
> non-clinical setting, but only where real patients turn up with
> unsolved problems. Side effects are more or less exceptional
> will easily be overlooked if the patients are not followed for long
> to see what happens when exposure has been reduced or eliminated.
> Per Dalen <pdalen@s...>
> Per Dalen <pdalen@s...>